2009 (2) TMI 139

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r (T) Shri Fateh Singh, DR, for the Appellant. Shri M.R. Ketan, Representative, for the Respondent. [Order per : D.N. Panda, Member (J)].- Revenue has come in appeal for enhancement of penalty, since penalty levied by ld. adjudicating authority was reduced to Rs.1,50,000/- by ld. Commissioner (Appeals). We have noticed from the last para of the appellate order that the respondent is a Gov....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ction of penalty to Rs.1,50,000/- shall be burden to an Undertaking owned by State of Himachal Pradesh which serves public interest and operates on public norms. Therefore in the fitness of circumstances we consider it proper to waive even the reduced amount of penalty imposed by ld. Commissioner (Appeals). We order accordingly while dismissing the appeal of Revenue. 5. We make it clear that we....