<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 139 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34118</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal seeking enhancement of penalty, ultimately waiving the reduced penalty of Rs.1,50,000 imposed by the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) on a Government of Himachal Pradesh Undertaking. The Tribunal considered the respondent&#039;s status as a State Undertaking, the public policy implications, and its power under Section 35C (1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, to waive the penalty in the interest of complete justice and public norms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 12:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72746" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 139 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34118</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal seeking enhancement of penalty, ultimately waiving the reduced penalty of Rs.1,50,000 imposed by the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) on a Government of Himachal Pradesh Undertaking. The Tribunal considered the respondent&#039;s status as a State Undertaking, the public policy implications, and its power under Section 35C (1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, to waive the penalty in the interest of complete justice and public norms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>