2023 (9) TMI 458
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sel ORDER Mr.B.Ramana Kumar, learned Senior Standing Counsel takes notice on behalf of the respondent. 2. The petitioner is before this Court against the impugned Orderin- Original No.18/2023(C) dated 23.03.2023 passed by the respondent. 3. By the impugned order, the respondent has confirmed a total tax liability of Rs.2,78,45,879/- as detailed below:- Sl.No. Issue Involved Service Tax pr....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....petitioner was issued with summons. The petitioner was required to produce certain details. The chartered accountant appointed by the petitioner appears to have sent a statement of reconciliation on 30.04.2019 with ST-3 Returns filed for the Assessment Years 2014-2015 to 2016-2017. Thereafter, the petitioner was again summoned to give the details. The petitioner had furnished some of the details. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ts of the petitioner with the Bank. Therefore, this Writ Petition cannot be entertained. 10. Ordinarily, as against the impugned order, the petitioner should have filed a statutory appeal before the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) within a stipulated period under Section 86(1) of the Finance Act, 1994. However, the period for filing the appeal has expired by the time wh....


TaxTMI
TaxTMI