<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 458 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442836</link>
    <description>The writ petition was dismissed, allowing the petitioner to file a statutory appeal before the CESTAT within thirty days, with a pre-deposit requirement of 7.5% of the disputed tax amount. The CESTAT was directed to consider the appeal without regard to the limitation period and decide on its merits. No costs were awarded, and the related Writ Miscellaneous Petition was closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2023 09:23:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=725703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 458 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442836</link>
      <description>The writ petition was dismissed, allowing the petitioner to file a statutory appeal before the CESTAT within thirty days, with a pre-deposit requirement of 7.5% of the disputed tax amount. The CESTAT was directed to consider the appeal without regard to the limitation period and decide on its merits. No costs were awarded, and the related Writ Miscellaneous Petition was closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>