2009 (6) TMI 17

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Court was delivered by F. M. IBRAHIM KALIFULLA, J. - The assessee has come forward with this appeal challenging the order of the Tribunal dated 19.11.2008, in I.T.A.No.79/MDS/2008, for the assessment year 2004-05. 2. The grievance of the appellant is that the Tribunal ought not to have interfered with that part of the order of the C.I.T.(Appeals), in and by which, the assessment order wa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....much as, the appellant was represented by her own Auditor viz., Mr. S. Thyagarajan, who filed the return on behalf of the appellant.  5. That apart, either in the course of the hearing before the assessing officer or before the C.I.T. Appeals, the appellant never raised any grievance as regards the appearance made by Mr. S. Thyagarajan on her behalf, on the footing that there was no proper....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....c.143(2) of the Act.  We restore the order of the Assessing Officer and reverse the order of the C.I.T.(Appeals) on this issue. 6. Adverting to the merits of the case, we find that the C.I.T.(Appeals) has not adequately discussed the issue in the impugned order. As such, in the interest of justice, we set aside the impugned order and remand this issue back to the file of the C.I.T.(Appeals....