<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 17 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33940</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras dismissed the appeal in Tax Case (Appeal) No. 79/MDS/2008, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision to remand the issue back to the C.I.T.(Appeals) for a de novo decision regarding an assessment order for the year 2004-05. The appellant&#039;s argument on the service of notice was rejected, as the appellant was represented by an auditor during the assessment and appeal process, with no objections raised at the time. The Court emphasized that the specific circumstances of the case should not set a precedent for future cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=72568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 17 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33940</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras dismissed the appeal in Tax Case (Appeal) No. 79/MDS/2008, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision to remand the issue back to the C.I.T.(Appeals) for a de novo decision regarding an assessment order for the year 2004-05. The appellant&#039;s argument on the service of notice was rejected, as the appellant was represented by an auditor during the assessment and appeal process, with no objections raised at the time. The Court emphasized that the specific circumstances of the case should not set a precedent for future cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>