Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (8) TMI 1151

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d communication dated 17.02.2020 of the first respondent as the Designated Committee under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019. 2. The petitioner is a service tax assessee who had suffered an adverse order in the hands of the Joint Commissioner of Central Excise dated 28.02.2017 vide Order in Original No.11/2016-S.T.dated 26.02.2016. The petitioner had therefore filed on 11.04.2016 before the Appellate Commissioner. The petitioner pre-deposited a sum of Rs. 2,37,402/- being 7.5% of the disputed tax amount confirmed vide order in Original No.11/2016-S.T. Dated 26.02.2016 by the Joint Commissioner of Central Excise dated 28.02.2017 under Section 35 F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 as made applicable to appeal filed ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r under the SVLDRS Scheme. 9. The petitioner thus agreed to pay only a sum of Rs. 3,95,668/- after adjusting Rs. 5,53,937/- already pre-deposited. The first respondent Designated Committee has however recognized only Rs. 2,37,402/- in Form SVLDRS-2 on the ground that only the aforesaid amount was paid within the jurisdiction where the petitioner was registered at Pondicherry. The balance amount of R.3,16,535/- was paid before Gurugram Commissionerate Code . 10. On behalf of the petitioner, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the amount that has been paid in excess of predeposit in Appeal ST/41111/2017-DB is not in dispute as is evident from Misc.Order No.40276/2018 dated 12.03.2018 of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Ap....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Rs. 31,65,352/- at the time of filing the first appeal before the Appellate Commissioner. 17. The petitioner has subsequently pre-deposited a further a sum of Rs. 3,16,535/- on 30.11.2017 vide challan No.50259. It is equal to 10% of the amount that was confirmed by the Joint Commissioner of Central Excise vide Order in Original No.11/2016-ST dated 26.02.2016. Thus, there is no dispute the amount that 17.5% of (disputed tax) amounting to Rs. 5,53,937/- [ Rs. 2,37,403 + Rs. 3,16,535/-] was pre-deposited by the petitioner as mentioned the above. 18. Under Section 124(2) of the SVLDRS, 2019 makes it clear that any amount paid as pre-deposit at any stage of appellate proceedings under the indirect tax enactment or as deposit during enquir....