<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1151 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442172</link>
    <description>Under Section 124(2) of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, any amount paid as a pre-deposit in appellate proceedings must be deducted from the amount payable by the declarant. Where the assessee had made pre-deposits against the same indirect tax demand, the fact that part of the deposit was made through another commissionerate did not change its character as a pre-deposit. The statutory adjustment was not confined to deposits made within the local jurisdiction of the registered office, and the entire pre-deposit amount had to be fully credited while computing the scheme liability. The assessee&#039;s claim for full adjustment was therefore accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2023 08:21:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1151 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442172</link>
      <description>Under Section 124(2) of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, any amount paid as a pre-deposit in appellate proceedings must be deducted from the amount payable by the declarant. Where the assessee had made pre-deposits against the same indirect tax demand, the fact that part of the deposit was made through another commissionerate did not change its character as a pre-deposit. The statutory adjustment was not confined to deposits made within the local jurisdiction of the registered office, and the entire pre-deposit amount had to be fully credited while computing the scheme liability. The assessee&#039;s claim for full adjustment was therefore accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=442172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>