Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New Feature Launched βœ•

Introducing the β€œIn Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.

  • βš–οΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
  • πŸ” Narrow down results with higher precision

Try it now in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2019 (5) TMI 1987

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tion of Rs. 5,40,000/- being the initial investment/cost price of shares purchased on 16.05.2013 out of past savings & earnings duly shown in the balance sheet of the assessee is ab initio illegal, arbitrary and bad in law. 3. For that only the income of the relevant year should have been added and not the entire receipt which comprises of the initial investments made by the assessee and therefore Rs. 5,40,000/- may be deleted. 4. For that charging of interest u/s. 234 B & C on the assessed income is in contrary to law in view of the decision of Hon'ble Jharkhand High Court in the case of Ajay Prakash Verma dated 25.07.2012 in Tax Appeal No. 38 of 2010 reported in 2013 (1) JCR 580 (Jhr.) relying upon Smt. Tej Kumari Vrs. CIT (2001)114 T....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....her appeal before the Tribunal. 5. Ld. AR submitted that Rs. 5,40,000/- is the initial investment/cost price of shares purchased on 16.05.2013 which is out of past savings & earnings and the same has duly been shown in the balance sheet of the assessee. It was further submitted by the ld. AR that only the income of the relevant year should have been added and not the entire receipt which comprises of the initial investments made by the assessee and therefore prayed that the addition made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A) may be deleted 6. Replying to the above, ld. DR strongly supported the orders of authorities below and submitted that the assessee has not shown any income in the profit and loss account nor any income was reflected w....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... capital Gain of Rs. 5,05,265/- only instead of Rs. 10,45,265/-being the income of the assessee and not the entire sale receipts, which Included Rs. 5,40,000/- being the investment made by the assessee in purchase of shares. The investment was duly shown in balance sheet of the assessee in previous year and was made out of past earning & savings. To support his claim, ld. AR of the assessee produced copies of balance sheet as on 31.03.2014. On perusal of the same, it reveals that Rs. 3,60,000/- and Rs. 1,80,000/- totalling to Rs. 5,40,000/- have been shown in the balance sheet in the name of Kailash Auto on purchase of 2000 and 1000 shares respectively for the assessment year 2014-2015, which is the investments of previous year and cannot b....