<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1987 - ITAT RANCHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309265</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 5,40,000 as unexplained investment in shares and the interest charged under sections 234B &amp;amp; C of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that only the Long Term Capital Gain of Rs. 5,05,265 should have been added, not the entire sale consideration, and held that charging interest on the assessed income was contrary to law based on a judgment of the Hon&#039;ble Jharkhand High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2023 22:13:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=723252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1987 - ITAT RANCHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309265</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 5,40,000 as unexplained investment in shares and the interest charged under sections 234B &amp;amp; C of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that only the Long Term Capital Gain of Rs. 5,05,265 should have been added, not the entire sale consideration, and held that charging interest on the assessed income was contrary to law based on a judgment of the Hon&#039;ble Jharkhand High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=309265</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>