Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2008 (11) TMI 128

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the finding that IIQA registered as a provider of 'Technical Inspection and Certification' service' since 1-7-03 with the Trichy Central Excise Commissionerate, had rendered service of consulting engineer during the period April, 2000 to June, 2003. The original authority found that though the appellants were registered under the head Technical Inspection and Certification service since 1-7-03, they had rendered service of consulting engineer since 1999. He analyzed the activities undertaken by the appellants and found that IIQA rendered service of consulting engineer and not of Technical Inspection and Certification service. Hence, the demand under Engineering Consultancy, which has been affirmed in the impugned order. The Commissioner (A....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he department as a provider of service under the category Technical Inspection and Certification service. 3. Relying on the decision of the Tribunal in Cameo Corporation Services Ltd. v. CCE, (S.T.), Chennai, [2008] (11) S.T.R. 161 (Tri.-Chen.)] and Diebold Systems (P) Ltd. v. CCE (S.T.), Chennai, [2008] (9) S.T.R. 546 (Tri.-Chen.)], appellants have argued that the impugned order was not sustainable in law. The ratio of the above decisions was that when a new entry was introduced under the Act as a category of service exigible to tax, it was pre-supposed that those activities were not covered by any pre-existing entry. 4. Ld. JDR submits that all along IIQA had rendered only service classifiable under the heading Consulting Engineer. IIQA....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rity. More important of the observations are extracted below. On an analysis of these activities, the original authority came to the conclusion that the assessee is engaged in engineering consultancy. "(i) The services provided by IIQA are not mere inspection/witnessing of the work, but the work was performed using their technical expertise in their field. (iv) The services provided by IIQA are not any statutory inspection but only a 'third party inspection' (vii) The purpose of using the technical expertise of IIQA by various parties was clearly to maintain the prescribed quality parameters and further to improve the quality of their products. (viii) The order No. 1/1/2002-S.T., dated 26-2-2002 clarifies the question whether third part....