<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 128 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32931</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the decision imposing service tax and penalties on M/s. Indian Institution of Quality Assurance (IIQA) for providing services as a Consulting Engineer prior to 1-7-03. The Tribunal found that IIQA&#039;s activities were correctly classified under Technical Inspection and Certification service post-1-7-03, rendering the demand for the pre-1-7-03 period unjustified. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the tax liability under the Consulting Engineer category for the specific period in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 128 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32931</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the decision imposing service tax and penalties on M/s. Indian Institution of Quality Assurance (IIQA) for providing services as a Consulting Engineer prior to 1-7-03. The Tribunal found that IIQA&#039;s activities were correctly classified under Technical Inspection and Certification service post-1-7-03, rendering the demand for the pre-1-7-03 period unjustified. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the tax liability under the Consulting Engineer category for the specific period in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>