Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (5) TMI 937

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he effect that some unscrupulous operators are engaged in importing consignments from Hongkong and China grossly mis-declaring the description and value of the consignments using the IEC registered in the name of other person and shell companies. 2.1 After preliminary investigation, it was found that one M/s A.S.S.Tradcom of 10, Saha Lane, Kolkata-700007 having IEC No.0217504108 imported six consignments at Kolkata Port from Hongkong/China, out of which, two were already cleared, for another three consignments, Bills of Entry were filed and the Bill of Entry was yet to be filed for the six consignments. It was found that IEC holders are not the actual importers of these consignments. The copy of IEC has been obtained from DGFT. It was furt....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed that one Shri Monoj Singhal wanted to import the above consignments from Hongkong and it was in search of a person, who could give IEC to him on rent and for that he will pay some money. 2.2 The statement of the appellant was recorded in correction of the above consignments on 03.01.2018, wherein he has stated as under : 12.14.1 He is Prop. of a customs clearing company named A.K. Enterprise, 310-311, 3rd floor, 7/28 Vardaan House, Ansari Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi-110002. 12.14.2 He is also a 'G' Card holder of M/s phenomenal Logista, RZA-23, Anoop Nagar, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi-110059, another custom Broking firm. 12.14.3 His Mobile numbers are 9811282247,9643317457. From his mobile no. 9811282247, he has called a number of times....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rma agreed to help. 12.14.12 He came to Kolkata along with Manoj Singhal on 23.08.2017. He met Shri Sanjay Agarwal at NSCBI Airport who had come to receive them. 12.14.13 He met Shri Laxman at some hotel at Park Street where Shri Laxman told about some Customs alert and informed them that the goods could not be examined. 12.14.14 Manoj Singhal called Sameer Sharma and asked him to come to Kolkata with the officer as promised. 12.14.15 On 25.08.2017, Sameer Sharma arrived at Kolkata along with Mr. D. K. Jain whom he knew since his posting at ICD/TKD. 12.14.16 Manoj Singhal informed that there was an alert from DRI Kolkata and there were three Bills of Entry filed and one consignment still pending to be filed. 12.14.17 He informed....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....se notice was issued to the appellant and it was held that the appellant acted as a middleman between mastermind Shri Monoj Singhal and Shri Sameer Sharma, who further acted as a contact man for Shri Dhan Kumar Jain. The appellant was well aware that it is a case of mis-declared import and Shri Dhan Kumar Jain was requested to influence to DRI Officers, so that the mis-declared goods may be cleared. Therefore, it was held that the appellant is liable for penal action and consequently, penalty of Rs.20.00 lakhs was imposed under Section 112 (a) & (b) of the Customs Act, 1962. Against the said order, the appellant is before us. 3. The ld.Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, submits that the appellant was neither filed any Bill of En....