<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 937 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438130</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the penalty imposed on the appellant under Sections 112 (a) and 112 (b) of the Customs Act, 1962, for alleged involvement in mis-declaration and undervaluation of imported consignments. The Tribunal found no incriminating evidence against the appellant, who was deemed to have acted under a bona fide belief, and thus no penalty was deemed imposable. Consequently, the Tribunal provided consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 13:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=714467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 937 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438130</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the penalty imposed on the appellant under Sections 112 (a) and 112 (b) of the Customs Act, 1962, for alleged involvement in mis-declaration and undervaluation of imported consignments. The Tribunal found no incriminating evidence against the appellant, who was deemed to have acted under a bona fide belief, and thus no penalty was deemed imposable. Consequently, the Tribunal provided consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>