2023 (3) TMI 116

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dance with the grounds of appeal raised by the appellant before him. I. Challenging the validity of notice issued u/s.148 of the Act for reopening the assessment u/s.147 of the Act as well as passing the order u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act. 1. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in confirming the action of the Ld. AO in issuing the notice u/s,.148 of the Act for reopening the assessment u/s.147 of the Act as well as passing the order u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act. 2. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in not considering the fact that reopening of the case of the appellant under section 147 of the Act by the Ld. AO merely on the basis of borrowed satisfaction without application of mind in ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... or and that declared by the appellant is less than 10 per cent, the AO should adopt the value as declared by appellant in view of various judicial pronouncements of various courts. In the case of appellant, the sale value declared by appellant in the return of income in respect of land at Rundh is Rs.9,49,89,978/- and the value as determined by the District Valuation Officer (DVO) is Rs.10,34,91,000/- which is approximately 8.95% higher but less than 10% and hence the value adopted by the appellant is to be accepted by the Ld. AO. 4. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in not properly considering various judicial pronouncements relied upon by the appellant. PRAYER The appellant therefore respectfully prays tha....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r Market Value as decided for stamp duty) of the property is levied. The property was sold for less sale consideration as compared to market value as on doing reverse working for deriving Jantri Value of the property under consideration. After taking cognisance of the assessee's reply, the Assessing Officer made addition of Rs.3,43,840/- under Section 50C of the Act. 4. Being aggrieved by the Assessment Order, the assessee filed appeal before the CIT(A). The CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal of the assessee. 5. The Ld. AR submitted that as regards to ground no.1, challenging the validity of notice issued under Section 148 of the Act, the CIT(A) erred in not considering the fact that reopening of the case of the assessee under Section 1....