<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 116 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434730</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, quashing the reopening of assessment and deleting the addition on account of Long Term Capital Gain by Rs.86,451 out of the total addition of Rs.3,43,830. The Tribunal found that the notice for reopening assessment was valid, based on independent satisfaction. However, it accepted the Assessee&#039;s arguments regarding the Long Term Capital Gain, considering the property&#039;s litigated nature and the value declared in the return of income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2023 08:36:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=706215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 116 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434730</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, quashing the reopening of assessment and deleting the addition on account of Long Term Capital Gain by Rs.86,451 out of the total addition of Rs.3,43,830. The Tribunal found that the notice for reopening assessment was valid, based on independent satisfaction. However, it accepted the Assessee&#039;s arguments regarding the Long Term Capital Gain, considering the property&#039;s litigated nature and the value declared in the return of income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>