2023 (2) TMI 228

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Applicant Shri Kalpesh P Shah, Assistant Commissioner (AR) for the Respondent ORDER The issue involved in the present case is that whether the re-credit claimed by the appellant is correct or not in terms of para 2C of area based exemption Notification No. 39/2001- CE dated 31.07.2001. This appeal was filed against the Commissioner (Appeals) order whereby the Learned Commissioner (Appe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tion No. 39/2001- CE dated 31.07.2001 therefore, there is no reason to object the re-credit. He submits that there is no challenge to re-credit availed for 5 years and the show cause notice was issued after 5 years invoking larger period under Section 11 A for recovery of duties on the ground that they are not covered under the Notification. 3. He submits that while taking the re-credit as per ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Section 11 A with larger period not invokable. He submits that as per the Hon'ble Supreme Court judgment in the case of SRD Nutrients Pvt Ltd - 2017 355 ELT 481 (SC) the credit on education cess and SHE cess was allowed. Even though subsequently the Hon'ble Supreme Court has passed the contrary judgment in the case of Unicorn Industries - 2019 (370) E.L.T. 3 (S.C.) but it will not affect the deman....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... We have carefully considered the submission made by both sides and perused the records. We find force in the argument of learned counsel that the Learned Commissioner (Appeals) instead of remanding the matter to the Jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner he could have decided the matter finally at his end. The appellant emphatically argued on the issue of limitation. The learned Commissioner (Appe....