<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 228 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433713</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that where the appellant had raised limitation and other grounds, the Commissioner (Appeals) was required to decide the appeal on all issues himself and not remand the matter to the Adjudicating Authority. The remand was therefore set aside, and the matter was directed back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh decision on the merits without further remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 07:34:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 228 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433713</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that where the appellant had raised limitation and other grounds, the Commissioner (Appeals) was required to decide the appeal on all issues himself and not remand the matter to the Adjudicating Authority. The remand was therefore set aside, and the matter was directed back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh decision on the merits without further remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>