Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2023 (1) TMI 1173

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Tax Act, 1961, in short 'the Act'. Heard both the parties. Case files perused. 2. It transpires at the outset that the Revenue's former "lead" appeal ITA No.838/PUN/2022 for A.Y. 2018-19 raises the following substantive grounds: "(a) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in treating the amount of Rs.99,20,61,868/- as non taxable in India, on the ground that the services were rendered outside India, without appreciating the facts that the assessee had failed to fulfill all conditions as laid down in clause (b) of section 9(1)(vi) of the I. T. Act, 1961. (b) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in treating the FTS receiv....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f the I T Act. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld.CIT(A) has erred in treating the FIS received by the assessee from Infosys Ltd, being not accrued or arose in India, without appreciating the fact that, the assessee had fulfilled all the conditions as enumerated in clause (b) of Article 12(4) of India-USA DTAA. 3. The appellant craves leave to add to, alter, amend, modify or withdraw all or any of the above ground(s) of appeal either at the time of the hearing or before the-hearing of this appeal." 3. Both the learned representatives next invited our attention to the CIT(A)'s detailed discussion reversing the Assessing Officer's action holding the sum of Rs.68,72,13,090/- as taxable i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt also provides Colocation services i.e. that allow Infosys to store their own equipment/hardware which is utilized by Infosys for provision of services to its customer i.e McDonalds. These services by its very nature can only be provided/utilized/ availed only where Colocation facilities/infrastructure is situated (which is in Philadelphia 1500 Spring Garden, 19130) Thus Infosys is availing and utilizing the services of the Appellant in USA, to earn income from its customer i.e. McDonald's located in USA (i.e. from a source outside India). Infosys has availed the services from the Appellant for in turn rendering services to its customer outside India and hence the source of income lies outside India. In view of the same,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssment findings that the assessee had indeed provided fee for technical services "FTS" to M/s. Wipro Ltd. and therefore, the Assessing Officer had rightly invoked deeming fiction of income u/s. 9(1)(vii) read with Sec. 9(2) Explanation that mere absence of payee/assessee's permanent establishment "PE" in India would not be fatal to the Revenue's cause. He also quoted this tribunal's co-ordinate bench order in Groupo Antolin Irausa SA V/s. DDIT ITA NO. 1442/PN/2017 that assessee's services rendered to M/s. Wipro Ltd. in USA give rise to its taxability in India only. 5. We find no merit in Revenue's instant arguments. This is for the precise reason that the assessee herein ; M/s. Sungard Availability Services LLP (a USA based entity)....