Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the receipts from provision of cloud infrastructure, colocation, mainframe and data recovery services were taxable in India as fees for technical services or fees for included services when the services were rendered from facilities in the USA and the recipient could not independently use any technical knowledge, experience, skill, knowhow or processes.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the application of section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, read with section 9(2) and the India-USA DTAA under section 90(2). The services were found to have been rendered outside India, with the relevant infrastructure and data processing facilities located in the USA. The treaty provision in Article 12(4)(b) required the services to make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, knowhow or processes to the recipient. On the facts recorded, no material showed any transfer of such enablement to the recipient, and the services were characterised as mere facility provision rather than transfer of technology.
Conclusion: The receipts were not taxable in India and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The common reasoning adopted earlier for the immediately preceding assessment year was followed, and the CIT(A)'s relief was affirmed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where services are rendered wholly outside India and do not make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, knowhow or processes to the recipient, the receipts are not taxable in India under the domestic deeming provision or the treaty article.