Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2019 (5) TMI 1966

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Shri Praveen Verma, Sr.DR ORDER PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA - AM : The captioned appeals have been filed at the instance of the Assessee against the separate orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-1, Rajkot [CIT(A) in short] dated 01/02/2018 in the matter of assessment order under s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") dated 11/01/2016 relevant t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssistance of the Ld.AR for the assessee and Ld.DR for the Revenue, we find that the Assessing Officer has disallowed interest expenditure of Rs.77,907/- in aggregate paid on loans received from relatives. It is found that the assessee has taken loan from the relatives @15%, whereas similar money has been simultaneously stood invested by way of loans and advances on which interest @ 12% p.a. has be....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ot, has erred in law and on facts for dismissing the Appeal filed against the order of Ld.Addl.CIT, Range-1(1) & 1(2), Rajkot in imposing penalty u/s.271D of the Act for contravention of provisions of section 269SS of the Act, in the matter of accepting unsecured deposit Rs.50000 in cash from, Smt.Komal N. Sahu, Wife of the Appellant. 6. With the assistance of Ld.AR for the assessee and Ld.DR f....