<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1966 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306362</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the disallowance of excess interest expenditure on loans from relatives at a higher rate but set aside the penalty imposed under section 271D for receiving cash from the spouse, emphasizing the need for commercial justifications in financial transactions and considering contextual nuances in applying penal provisions under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2023 19:59:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1966 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306362</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the disallowance of excess interest expenditure on loans from relatives at a higher rate but set aside the penalty imposed under section 271D for receiving cash from the spouse, emphasizing the need for commercial justifications in financial transactions and considering contextual nuances in applying penal provisions under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306362</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>