AI Drafter ✕

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required

Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now →

Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

TMI Blog

Home /

Previous Next

Petitioner advised to appeal u/s 33 of the VAT Act; Writ Petition under Article 226 not justified.

X X X X Extracts X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X Extracts X X X X

....The proper remedy for the petitioner would be to avail the remedy of Appeal in terms of Section 33 of the VAT Act. The material on record shows that the petitioner did not file the Appeal on the ground that filing of Appeal would make him to deposit 25% of the disputed tax. This cannot be a ground to file a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, before this Court. - HC....

Previous Next

Contact Us At :

FAQs :

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Petitioner advised to appeal u/s 33 of the VAT Act; Writ Petition under Article 226 not justified.