https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=67421 The proper remedy for the petitioner would be to avail the remedy of Appeal in terms of Section 33 of the VAT Act. The material on record shows that the petitioner did not file the Appeal on the ground that filing of Appeal would make him to deposit 25% of the disputed tax. This cannot be a ground to file a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, before this Court. - HC en-us Sat, 31 Dec 2022 10:45:29 +0530 Sat, 31 Dec 2022 10:45:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=67421 The proper remedy for the petitioner would be to avail the remedy of Appeal in terms of Section 33 of the VAT Act. The material on record shows that the petitioner did not file the Appeal on the ground that filing of Appeal would make him to deposit 25% of the disputed tax. This cannot be a ground to file a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, before this Court. - HC Highlights VAT and Sales Tax Sat, 31 Dec 2022 10:45:29 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=67421