2022 (12) TMI 819

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Captioned writ petition pertains to tenders floated by second respondent Municipality for construction of pavements, sheds and other public utilities on 27.02.2015, 30.11.2015 and 02.03.2016. Writ petitioner participated in the tender process, became successful and agreements were entered into. It may not be necessary to delve into more facts and be detained by factual particulars in the light of submission of Mr.A.Sivaji, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner (in the hearing) that he abridges the prayer in the writ petition and it would suffice if there is a directive to the second respondent to dispose of the representation of the writ petitioner dated 07.11.2022 (Page Nos.89 to 92 of typed set of papers). 2. Mr.S.Ravikumar, l....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....erefrom. 7. Though obvious, it is made clear that there is no expression of view or opinion in this order and the second respondent shall dispose of the aforementioned representation on its own merits and in accordance with law. Captioned Writ Petition disposed of with the aforesaid directive. There shall be no order as to costs. ============= Document 1 நகராட்சி அடுல 07 NOV 2022 .89 Date: 07.11.2022 7434 From: R. Subramaniam, பொள்ளாச்சி Civil Works Contractor, No. 103, Nallappa Nagar, Mahalingapuram, Pollachi 642002. To: 1. The Commissioner, Pollachi Municipality, Pollachi 6....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Municipality in their ommunication mentioned in the 2nd sited. On the account above, I am not all responsible/liable to pay the GST, re particularly when the tender was floated, the GST is not in force. spect 3. On the account of the pressure brought on me for e due payment of GST, for the tender floated before 7.2017, I paid the same for and of behalf the said nicipality. On account of the above facts, the cipient "Municipality" alone is liable and responsible pay the GST and not me as a contractor. Further the nder was floated when the GST was not in force. count of the fact that the GST was not in force when 731 On he tender was floated, the Municipality, would not have ticated the ....