https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431702 The Court directed the second respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 07.11.2022 on its own merits and in accordance with law within a fortnight. It further required the decision to be communicated to the petitioner under due acknowledgment within three working days. The Court confined its intervention to this procedural direction, expressly refrained from expressing any view on the merits, and did not adjudicate the underlying dispute between the employer and the contractor. en-us Tue, 13 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Apr 2025 12:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431702 The Court directed the second respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 07.11.2022 on its own merits and in accordance with law within a fortnight. It further required the decision to be communicated to the petitioner under due acknowledgment within three working days. The Court confined its intervention to this procedural direction, expressly refrained from expressing any view on the merits, and did not adjudicate the underlying dispute between the employer and the contractor. Case-Laws GST Tue, 13 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=431702