Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2022 (11) TMI 22

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....directed against judgment and order dated 7.2.2022 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, "D" Bench, in ITA No. 1235 of 2019 in respect of the Assessment Year 2010-2011. 2.1 The appellant Revenue has proposed the following substantial question of law claiming to be arising in the appeal, "Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the decision of the Appellate Tribunal is ex-facie perverse because the Appellate Tribunal has erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 39,05,50,000/- made u/s 68 of the Act for the funds received from M/s. Rachna Finlease Pvt. Ltd. without appreciating the entire gamut of facts making it evident that the transaction was in the nature of accommodation entry?" 3. The facts are that, a search was....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Assessment Year 2011-2012. It was the case of the assessee that the credit was recorded in the Books and was paid back also. Accordingly to the Assessing Officer, the explanation given by the assessee was not satisfactory to prove the creditworthiness of the creditor, that is M/s. Rachna Finlease Pvt. Ltd.. 4. Invoking provisions of section 68 of the Act, the Assessing Officer treated the amount of Rs. 39,05,50,000/- as unexplained cash credit and added in the total income of the assessee. Also started were the penalty proceedings under section 271 (1)(c) read with section 274 of the Act. Section 68 of the Act is regarding Cash Credits. It says that where any sum is found credited in the books of assessee maintained for any previous ye....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., the assesee could establish that M/s. Rachna Finlease Pvt. Ltd. had received money from one Smt. Hansaben H. Patel and from one Shri Rameshbhai Thakore and the said factumm was fortifiable from the bank statement of the creditor M/s. Rachna Finlease Pvt. Ltd. It was noted by the Appellate Authority that the said aspect was recorded by the 5.1 Assessing Officer also in paragraph No. 6.1.3 of its order, which reads as under, "On verification of the bank book of Rachna Finelease Pvt. Ltd. it is found that the fund have travelled within minutes of being credited from the bank account of Hansaben H. Patel and Rameshbhai Thakor and immediately the funds have landed in the bank account of JP Fincorp Services Pvt. Ltd. (Renamed as Ambe Tradeco....