<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 22 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429598</link>
    <description>The Tax Appeal challenged the addition of funds under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, received from M/s. Rachna Finlease Pvt. Ltd. The Appellate Authority and Tribunal found the appellant had adequately explained the source of funds and proved the genuineness of the transaction, rejecting the Assessing Officer&#039;s doubts. Despite the assessment being reopened under section 147 based on investigating wing information, subsequent appeals were dismissed, affirming the appellant&#039;s compliance with section 68 requirements. The Tribunal upheld the decisions, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s successful discharge of the burden of proof and dismissing the appeal challenging the unexplained cash credits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2022 10:17:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=694506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 22 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429598</link>
      <description>The Tax Appeal challenged the addition of funds under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, received from M/s. Rachna Finlease Pvt. Ltd. The Appellate Authority and Tribunal found the appellant had adequately explained the source of funds and proved the genuineness of the transaction, rejecting the Assessing Officer&#039;s doubts. Despite the assessment being reopened under section 147 based on investigating wing information, subsequent appeals were dismissed, affirming the appellant&#039;s compliance with section 68 requirements. The Tribunal upheld the decisions, emphasizing the appellant&#039;s successful discharge of the burden of proof and dismissing the appeal challenging the unexplained cash credits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=429598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>