Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (1) TMI 1695

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Kumar, Sr. DR. ORDER PER BENCH : These appeals have been filed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, Surat dated 24.08.2016 for A.Y.2007-08 to 2013- 14 by which penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer of Rs. 10,000/- for each assessment year u/s.271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the Act') 2. The sole effective ground raised by the assessee read....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e's paper book wherein medical papers showing health issues of persons including the present assessee have been placed. The ld. Counsel, further submitted that the distance from Surat to Bilimora, the place of residence of the assessee, is about 67 kms. and due to health issue the assessee could not comply with notices issued by the Assessing Officer and non-compliance was done due bonafide re....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lier deserves to be ignored by the Revenue Authorities. 5. Replying to the above, the ld. Senior Departmental Representative strongly supported the action of the Assessing Officer as well as first appellate order and submitted that there was deliberate non-compliance by the assessee, therefore, the Assessing Officer was right in imposing penalty and the CIT(A). was also correct in upholding the....