<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1695 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304635</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all the appeals of the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment years 2007-08 to 2013-14. The decision was based on the genuine health issues faced by the assessee, leading to non-compliance with the notice, which were considered beyond the assessee&#039;s control. The Tribunal emphasized fair treatment and individual circumstances in tax penalty cases, concluding that the penalty was unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2022 18:47:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=693021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1695 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304635</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all the appeals of the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment years 2007-08 to 2013-14. The decision was based on the genuine health issues faced by the assessee, leading to non-compliance with the notice, which were considered beyond the assessee&#039;s control. The Tribunal emphasized fair treatment and individual circumstances in tax penalty cases, concluding that the penalty was unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=304635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>