Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2008 (1) TMI 313

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pondent. JUDGMENT The judgment of the court was delivered by C. N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR J.— This is an appeal filed by the Revenue under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal rejecting the Departmental appeal. The question raised is whether the contribution of Rs. 25 lakhs paid by the assessee to the State Irrigation Department being par....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l improvement under the scheme was earth canal and the purpose of cement lining was to prevent loss of water in transit thereby providing better supply of water for irrigation of farm lands mainly cultivated with sugarcane. Since sugarcane is the raw material of the assessee and since extensive cultivation of sugarcane ensures supply to the assessee, the assessee claimed the expenditure as a busin....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....h decision of this court in CIT v. Glen View Rubber Co. P. Ltd. [2007 291 ITR 1 (Ker) [FB] and contended that the expenditure is capital expenditure in nature. However, counsel appearing for the respondent-assessee contended that the decision is not applicable to the facts of this case because it was found by this court that the assessee in that case has incurred expenditure for construction of a ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ty on account of non-availability of sugarcane. Therefore, this is a case where the assessee derives the benefit out of the expenditure, but does not create any asset for itself. The Supreme Court has in the decision reported in Empire Jute Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1980] 124 ITR 1, held that even if enduring advantage is derived from the expenditure incurred, it can still be allowed as a revenue expenditu....