Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2007 (10) TMI 248

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... The Judgment of the Court was delivered by K. RAVIRAJA PANDIAN J. - The Revenue has filed this appeal against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal made in ITA.No.1265/Mds/1993, dated 12.3.2001. The relevant assessment year is 1991-1992. 2. The facts as culled out from the statement go as follows:- 3. We heard the argument of the learned counsel for the Revenue and the learned couns....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Section 80HH was to be given and the balance amount only qualified for deduction under Section 80-I. On appeal, the Commissioner of Income Tax reversed the finding of the Assessing Officer and directed him to quantify the admissible relief under Section 80-I without adjusting the deduction allowed under Section 80HH. The revenue carried the matter on appeal to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, wh....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ned counsel appearing for either side that the very issue has been considered and held against the revenue by the Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of J.P.TOBACCO PRODUCTS P.LTD. VS. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX reported in (1998) 229 ITR 123. It has also been further submitted that the Bombay High Court also has taken the same view in the case of COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS. NIMA SPECIFIC FAM....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... CIT (1998) 229 ITR 123 (MP) was followed by the same High Court in the case of CIT v. Alpine Solvex P. Ltd. in I.T.A.No.92 of 1999 decided on Ma;y 2, 2000. Special leave petition against this was dismissed by this curt on January 12, 2001, (see (2001) 247 ITR (St.) 36). This view has been followed repeatedly by different High Courts in a number of cases against which no special leave petitions w....