Upgrade to AI Search ✕

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
     - Overview Summary
     - Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     - Relevant Case Laws
     - Tariff / Classification / HSN
     - Expert views from TaxTMI
     - Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

TMI Blog

Home /

Previous Next

2008 (6) TMI 28

X X X X Extracts X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X Extracts X X X X

....08 dated. 23.6.2008 certified on 9.7.2008 in Appeal No. ST/426/2007) Shri Pradyumna, Advocate, for the Appellants. Ms. Sudha Koka, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per S. L. Peeran, Member (Judicial)] - This appeal arises from the Order-in-Appeal No. 82/2007 dated 31.10. 2007 by which the Commissioner (Appeals) rejected the refund claim of Rs. 4,33,446/- under the provisions of unjust enrichment....

X X X X Extracts X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X Extracts X X X X

....ervices Pvt. Ltd., 2006 (2) STR 350 (Tri.-Kolkata) and J.R.K. Industries (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, 2006 (74) RLT 574 (CESTAT-Del.) = 2006 (206) ELT 338 (Tri.-Del.). 2. The learned DR submits that the amounts collected was required to be reimbursed to the Government as it was collected as duty/tax in terms of Section 11D of the Act. Even otherwise, the refund is hit by provision....

Previous Next

Contact Us At :

FAQs :

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

2008 (6) TMI 28