https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30614 The Tribunal rejected the appeal against the rejection of a refund claim under unjust enrichment provisions. The appellant failed to provide evidence to disprove unjust enrichment and did not remit the collected amount to the Government as required by Section 11D of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal found the case aligned with relevant precedents and distinguished the appellant's cited judgments as inapplicable. Consequently, the appeal was deemed meritless and dismissed. en-us Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Dec 2008 07:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30614 The Tribunal rejected the appeal against the rejection of a refund claim under unjust enrichment provisions. The appellant failed to provide evidence to disprove unjust enrichment and did not remit the collected amount to the Government as required by Section 11D of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal found the case aligned with relevant precedents and distinguished the appellant's cited judgments as inapplicable. Consequently, the appeal was deemed meritless and dismissed. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=30614