2022 (9) TMI 761
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d. F.A.A.) in an appeal before it against assessment order dated 19.01.2018 passed u/s 143(3) read with section 92CA(3) of the Act by Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 14(2), New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ld. Assessing Officer or in short Ld. AO). 2. The facts in brief are Assessee is a company engaged in business of import and delivery of coal to various PSUs, private sector/steel/cement and other utilities. Coal is being imported mainly from Indonesia/South Africa and small quantity of imported coal is procured locally in accordance with the requirements of customers and Power trading division is involved in scanning the power market on continuous basis and obtaining surplus power and selling the same in deficit ar....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ils of invoices raised and payment received there upon and the resulting interest chargeable is given below :- S.N o. Date of invoice Amount in USD Equivalen t Amount Date of receipt Difference of days Difference of days- 30 Interest @ 12.83% 1. Tuesday, December 31,2013 150217 9028012 Monday , June 30,2014 181.00 151.00 479184.6 2. Tuesday, December 31,2013 305430 18356282 Monday , June 30,2014 181 151.00 974306.2 3. Monday, March 31, 2014 907087 2 54515759 3 Tuesday , July 15, 2014 106 76.00 14563624 4. Monday, March 31, 2014 907087 2 34642990....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....). (ii) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT(A) was justified in relying upon the judgment of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of Indo American Jewelry Ltd. in ITA No. 1053 of 2012, ignoring the fact that Hon'ble Court has also stated therein its order that the delay in realization of export proceeds in both the cases is the same and on the other hand, in the instant case the taxpayer did not submit such details of breakup-wise amount realized during the F.Y. 2013-14 from the both areas (AEs & Non- AEs). (iii) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT(A] was justified in relying upon the judgment of Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of Indo American jewelry Ltd. in ITA No. 1053....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....re two sides of the same point and hence, both have to be taken together and only the net amount can be adjusted as a separate transaction. In the instant case, as the situation at the end of the year is one of net payable. However, the contention of the appellant is not accepted as each payable / receivable has to be taken separately and the delay in payment worked out accordingly." 8. The aforesaid observations clearly indicate that the aforesaid contention of assessee was discarded and the assessee has not challenged the same in either ways. 9. Then with regard to the directions issued by the ld. CIT(A) to AO / TPO giving rise to the grounds of present appeal of revenue it can be observed that at no stage during the hearing before TPO....