TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2022 (9) TMI 762
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....erred to as the 'Act'). The assessee in this appeal has taken the following grounds of appeal: "1. On facts and circumstances of the case, whether the Ld. CIT(A) is justified in holding that the matter involved in the case is identical to the case of the assessee that of A.Y 2010-11. 2. On facts and circumstances of the case, whether the Ld. CIT(A) is justified in deleting the addition on Rs.4,72,37,518/- on account of advance from customers. 3. On facts and circumstances of the case, whether the Ld. CIT(A) is justified in deleting the addition on Rs.8,58,786/- disallowed u/s 40(a)(ia) of the I.T. Act. 4. On facts and circumstances of the case, whether the Ld. CIT(A) is justified in deleting the addition ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....otors, the CIT(A) had partly upheld the additions made by the Assessing Officer on identical facts, however, the same also stood deleted by the decision of the ITAT. Therefore, following the decision of the Calcutta High Court in the assessee's own case for assessment year 2010-11 as well as decision of the Tribunal in various assessment years, the ld. CIT(A) deleted the additions for the year under consideration also. 3. Before us, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the advance received from the customers were adjusted in the sale price of motorcycles and profits so delivered were offered for taxation. Further that there was no mismatch in respect of the amount of total sale consideration received. That though, one of t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ribunal on the basis of evidence was satisfied that the money had in fact been received by way of advance and therefore, no question of any bogus liability being created was there as held by the Assessing Officer. In that view of the matter, we are of the opinion that the finding arrived at by the learned Tribunal is not perverse. Section 68 in the facts of the case had no applicability. The question is, thus, answered in favour of the assessee. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed." 4. Therefore, the issue is squarely covered by the jurisdictional High Court in the own case of the assessee. There is no merit in these grounds of the appeal of the assessee and the same are accordingly dismissed. 5. Ground Nos.3 & 4 - V....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....person responsible for paying any sum to any resident contractor for carrying out any work (including supply of labour for carrying out any work) in pursuance of a contract between a specified person and the resident contractor js required to deduct tax at source. There was no contract either verbal or written with Hero Moto Corp Limited regarding transport of motor cycle. Even we did not engage any individual transporter for transport of motor cycle from the factory of the above said company to our showroom. Moreover, the above said company did not issue any separate invoice for freight and insurance. Even we did not make any payment to any individual transporter. The payment which had been made to the above said company only agai....