2022 (9) TMI 115

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Jagpaul Singh, Advocate. ORDER 01. Heard Sh. Bharat Raichandani, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sh. Jagpaul Singh, learned counsel for the respondents. 02. The petitioner has invoked the extraordinary discretionary jurisdiction of this Court for quashing of the order dated 26.08.2020 whereby the respondents have declined part of his claim for budgetary support for the period January to ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e claim for budgetary support for the balance amount of Rs. 24,61,920/-. 05. The argument of learned counsel for the petitioner is that no reason has been assigned for rejecting the part of the claim for the budgetary support for the above period and that no notice or opportunity of hearing was given before doing so. 06. Sh. Jagpaul Singh, learned counsel has filed counter affidavit/objections t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e claim in respect of the balance amount has been rejected. 09. In addition to the above, the ineligibility of the petitioner to receive the budgetary support has been decided on the basis of the office memorandum dated 26.07.2021. The said office memorandum was not in existence on the date on which the impugned order was passed i.e. on 26.08.2020. Therefore, it is misconceived to allege that the....