<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 115 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427170</link>
    <description>HC quashed the order declining part of budgetary support claim for Jan-Mar 2020. The court found the respondents&#039; rejection lacking substantive reasoning and emphasized that order validity depends on internal justification. Without clear rationale for partial claim denial, the HC ruled in favor of the petitioner, remanding the matter for reconsideration with proper explanation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 12:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=689630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 115 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427170</link>
      <description>HC quashed the order declining part of budgetary support claim for Jan-Mar 2020. The court found the respondents&#039; rejection lacking substantive reasoning and emphasized that order validity depends on internal justification. Without clear rationale for partial claim denial, the HC ruled in favor of the petitioner, remanding the matter for reconsideration with proper explanation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=427170</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>