Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2006 (7) TMI 737

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ued a cheque bearing No. 004050 dated 25.12.2003 for Rs. 18,60,000/- drawn on Corporation Bank, Palam, New Delhi. When the cheque was presented, it was returned unpaid for the reason `Stop payment' vide returning memo dated 16.4.2004. The respondent served legal notice and thereafter filed the aforesaid complaint. Summons have been issued to the petitioner in the said complaint. Challenging the summoning order, the present petition is filed. 2. It is, inter alia, pleaded that there was no such loan transaction between the parties, the petitioner, on account of his being hard pressed for time, normally gives his cheque book to his wife at times with several signed cheque leaves; the fact was known to one Ranbir, S/o. Jundan Lal, who h....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Ex CW1/A is deposed to have been issued by the accused in discharge of his liabilities towards the complainant, and the cheque on presentation was dishonoured due to reason of "Funds insufficient on 16.04.04 vide return memo Ex CW1/D legal notice Ex CW1/C dated 13.05.04 was sent to the accused within the period of limitation through registered AD postal receipts. Exhibit CW1/D. It is deposed that even after receipt of notice the cheque amount have not been paid by the accused to the complainant. The present case has been filed within the prescribed period of limitation on 10.06.04. I am also satisfied regarding jurisdiction of this court. There is sufficient material to summon the Accused u/s. 138 Negotiable Instrument Act. Accordingly....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ficient grounds to proceed against the accused. Materials are available before the Court. The complaint is available. Sworn statement of the complainant and witnesses are available. Mind of the Court is applied to these materials judicially to decide whether the matter deserves to be proceeded with further by issue of process under Section 204 Cr.P.C. or whether proceedings deserve to be terminated by dismissal of the complaint under Section 203 Cr.P.C. In any view of the matter, the proceedings before the Criminal Court at that stage would certainly qualify to be "inquiry" as defined under Section 2(g). Under Section 2(g), inquiry means every inquiry, other than trial, conducted under this Code by a Magistrate or Court. In this view of the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... I find no merit in the contention that the sworn statement of the complainant and witnesses under Section 200 Cr.P.C. will not qualify to be evidence, Section 3 of the Evidence Act defines evidence in the following words : "Evidence" -- Evidence means and includes (I) all statements which the Court permit or requires to be made before it by witnesses, in relation to matters of fact under inquiry such statements are called oral evidence; (emphasis supplied) 15. All statements which the Court permits or requires to be made before it by witnesses in relation to facts under inquiry would be evidence. The provisions regarding the manner in which examination of witnesses is to take place and the order of examination in chapt....