https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303890 In a cheque dishonour complaint, disputed defences such as denial of loan, alleged misuse of a blank cheque, and stop-payment instructions could not be resolved in proceedings under Section 482 CrPC and had to be tested at trial. The Court also held that, at the pre-summoning stage, the Magistrate could proceed on the complainant's affidavit under Section 145 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and that personal tendering of the affidavit was not indispensable. The summoning order was therefore upheld and the prosecution was allowed to continue. en-us Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Aug 2022 09:58:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303890 In a cheque dishonour complaint, disputed defences such as denial of loan, alleged misuse of a blank cheque, and stop-payment instructions could not be resolved in proceedings under Section 482 CrPC and had to be tested at trial. The Court also held that, at the pre-summoning stage, the Magistrate could proceed on the complainant's affidavit under Section 145 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and that personal tendering of the affidavit was not indispensable. The summoning order was therefore upheld and the prosecution was allowed to continue. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303890