TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2022 (8) TMI 630
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Narula, Advocate for the petitioner in CRM-M-34606-2021. Mr. Sumeet Puri, Advocate for the petitioner in CRM-M-15248-2021. Mr. Parveen Kumar, Advocate for Mr. Abhimanyu Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner in CRM-M-47869-2021. Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Sourabh Goel, Advocate, Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent-Director General of GST (Intelligence). AMOL RATTAN SINGH, J (Oral) CRM-M-41006-2020 Vide this petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.0008 registered at Police Station Kanina, District Mahendergarh, on 05.01.2019, alleging therein the commission of offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 201, 120-B IPC and Section 132 (1)(B(C) of the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....at the case registered at Delhi is on the same set of facts as the one registered at Haryana and therefore Section 6 of C/HGST Act 2017 will be applicable on the facts of the present case. 5. That due to an inadvertent mistake the DETC, Narnaul in its affidavit dated 03/09/21 has submitted in the Hon'ble Court that the cases filed against the petitioner at Delhi and Haryana are different. The law regarding GST is an evolving law and the offences under Section 132 of the GST Act are of multiple nature involving several technicalities and therefore the DETC has only relied upon the information which was availed with him at that time. Even though the mistake was unintentional, the deponent tenders an unconditional apology in this ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....on earlier dates but are on the file of this case as well as on the files of the other connected petitions, are ordered to be taken on record. CRM-M-34606-2021 & CRM-M-47869-2021 CRM-M-18621-2021 CRM-M-15248-2021 Vide CRM-M-34606-2021 & CRM-M-47869-2021, the petitioners seek the concession of 'regular bail' under the provisions of Section 439 of the Cr.P.C., upon FIR no.8, dated 05.01.2019, having been registered at Police Station Kanina, District Narnaul, alleging therein the commission of offences punishable under the provisions of Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of the IPC (Sections 201 IPC and Section 132 (1)(B)(C) of the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 having been added later on). Vide CRM-M-18621-202....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e is also an allegation of destruction of evidence and thereby with an offence under Section 201 of the IPC having been committed. Keeping in view the nature of the allegations against the petitioners in these petitions, who have already been admitted to interim bail on that very ground by this court, and with their being no report of any misuse of concession, without making any comment whatsoever on the actual merits either of their cases, the orders passed in each case, admitting them to interim bail, are made absolute on the same terms and conditions. The petitions are allowed as above. CRM-M-21829-2022 The reply filed on behalf of the respondent-State, dated 08.07.2022, is ordered to be taken on record. Though Mr. Sanghi,....