https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426391 Parallel GST proceedings based on the same factual foundation were held impermissible under the GST regime, so the FIR was quashed to the extent it invoked the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, while the IPC offences were left to continue. The record reflected an admitted identity of cause of action between the earlier GST investigation and the Haryana FIR, engaging the bar against duplicate proceedings. Interim bail granted to certain petitioners was also made absolute because their role was stated to be limited and there was no report of misuse of the concession. en-us Wed, 03 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Apr 2025 17:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426391 Parallel GST proceedings based on the same factual foundation were held impermissible under the GST regime, so the FIR was quashed to the extent it invoked the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, while the IPC offences were left to continue. The record reflected an admitted identity of cause of action between the earlier GST investigation and the Haryana FIR, engaging the bar against duplicate proceedings. Interim bail granted to certain petitioners was also made absolute because their role was stated to be limited and there was no report of misuse of the concession. Case-Laws GST Wed, 03 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=426391