TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2022 (7) TMI 1066
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... above, the application of applicant/accused is allowed. Applicant/accused is allowd to travel to England with effect from 25.06.2022 to 25.07.2022 subject to th terms and conditions as contained in the order dated 06.09.2019 of Ld. Special Judge (PC Act): (CBI)-11, Rouse Avenue, Delhi in CC No. 55/19 titled as ED Vs. Jatinder Pal Singh which are as follows: (i) That applicant/accused shall furnish personal bond in the sum of Rs. 3,00,000/- in addition to personal bond. (ii) That applicant/accused shall also furnish one local surety in the sum of Rs. 3,00,000/- in addition to surety bond. (iii) He shall inform the court about his arrival in India within 72 hours of completion of his entire journey. (iv) In any eventuality, applica....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... of Delhi Police and FIR No. 0200 was registered for commission of substantive offences under Section 120B read with Sections 420/468/471 IPC against the respondent and others. 3.1 Searches were again conducted at the residence of the respondent on 30.12.2021 and various incriminating documents and electronic devices were found and seized. 3.2 The accused was arrested on 31.12.2021. He was bailed out on 17.01.2022 and a condition was put that he shall not leave the country without the permission of the Court. 3.3 Directorate of Enforcement has challenged the said order of bail before this Court by filing separate proceedings and notice has been issued by this Court. 4. The prosecution complaint was filed on 28.02.2022. The respondent mo....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....der investigation. The order from the learned Special Judge was obtained by misleading the said Court. The apprehension is that the respondent will not return back; he has not disclosed his foreign assests and businesses; no genuine reason has been given to go abroad; Section 45 of PML Act stands revived and it has been wrongly observed that the same is no longer applicable; the respondent is a flight risk and the condition of deposit of passport in the bail order in the present case has not been set aside by this Court and cognisance is yet to be taken. 9. On behalf of the respondent, it has been submitted that the impugned order is well reasoned. The High Court in order dated 21.05.2021 waved the condition of deposit of passport in the e....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....year 2016 and he is taking blood thinning medicines prescribed by his treating doctors. For removal of maxillofacial cyst, he has to stop taking the said drug. Hence, the supervision, care and treatment under Doctor Ramasamy Danapal based in London is required, who is well aware of the respondent's medical history. 10.3 Heart checkup facility of 640 Slice CT Scan is available in Apollo Hospital but he does not want to get himself admitted to the said hospital. There is no appointment available for the surgery in AIIMS till the end of August, 2022. Moreover, AIIMS does not have the facility of 640 Slice CT Scan. So, the respondent has to urgently travel to UK to get the necessary heart checkups and to have the the surgery done. 11. The pet....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... was put afresh. 13.1 One of the apprehensions expressed by the present petitioner is that the respondent may tamper with the evidence and he may influence the witnesses. Learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that till date, officials of the petitioner have failed to point out as to what is the evidence abroad, which will be tampered with by the respondent during his treatment period or who are the witnesses who will be influenced by him. 14. The other apprehension of the petitioner is that the respondent will not return back to the country. This apprehension is nullified on the ground that in the last more than 10 years, he has travelled abroad on many occasions and has returned back on time and he has complied with all the co....