https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425511 Foreign travel may be permitted where bona fide medical necessity is shown and the accused's past compliance with court conditions dispels a concrete apprehension of flight risk or interference with justice. The Delhi High Court upheld permission to travel abroad for specialised medical treatment because the respondent demonstrated a genuine need for supervision by a doctor familiar with his condition during maxillofacial surgery, and objections based on alleged availability of treatment in India were not sufficient to deny travel. Concerns about tampering with evidence and non-return were also rejected in the absence of specific material showing likely interference. en-us Wed, 20 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Jul 2022 09:17:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425511 Foreign travel may be permitted where bona fide medical necessity is shown and the accused's past compliance with court conditions dispels a concrete apprehension of flight risk or interference with justice. The Delhi High Court upheld permission to travel abroad for specialised medical treatment because the respondent demonstrated a genuine need for supervision by a doctor familiar with his condition during maxillofacial surgery, and objections based on alleged availability of treatment in India were not sufficient to deny travel. Concerns about tampering with evidence and non-return were also rejected in the absence of specific material showing likely interference. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 20 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425511