2022 (7) TMI 223

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Dalal for the Appellant. Mr. Ashok Kotangle a/w. Mr. P.A. Narayanan a/w. Mr. Sandeep Gupta for the Respondents. P.C. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. By this Appeal, the Appellant has challenged the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai dated 30 December 2002 in Income Tax Appeal No. 1709/Bom/1995 for the assessment year 1990-91. 3. The Appeal was a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ant filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal which was dismissed by the impugned order. 5. The Tribunal dismissed the Appeal observing thus: "4. We have carefully considered the rival submissions and perused the record. As per the A/R, on the CRR maintained by the assessee, interest is receivable @ 3 % per annum whereas when there is a failure to maintain the CRR, the a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... in the instant case is not allowable as deduction being penal in nature. The learned CIT (A) having given detailed reasons in coming to the conclusion that the interest is not compensatory in nature, we see no reason to interfere with his order." 6. The learned Counsel for the parties have placed before us the decision of this Court in the case of The Commissioner of Income Tax-2 vs. Bank of B....