<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 223 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424668</link>
    <description>Interest charged by the Reserve Bank of India for default in maintaining the cash reserve ratio was treated as a compensatory payment linked to banking operations, not as a penalty, and was therefore allowable as business expenditure in computing business income. The Court followed its earlier banking decision on similar interest paid for non-maintenance of statutory reserve requirements, including cash reserve ratio and statutory liquidity ratio, and held the deduction admissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 08:14:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 223 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424668</link>
      <description>Interest charged by the Reserve Bank of India for default in maintaining the cash reserve ratio was treated as a compensatory payment linked to banking operations, not as a penalty, and was therefore allowable as business expenditure in computing business income. The Court followed its earlier banking decision on similar interest paid for non-maintenance of statutory reserve requirements, including cash reserve ratio and statutory liquidity ratio, and held the deduction admissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>