2019 (9) TMI 1648
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... This is an appeal by the assessee wherein the assessee is aggrieved that the learned CIT-A has erred in sustaining 12.5% disallowance on account of bogus purchases, vide order dated 09.10.2017 pertaining to assessment year 2010-11. 2. Brief facts of the case are that assessee in this case is engaged in business of trading in ferrous and non ferrous metals. The Assessment in this case was re....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e to produce the suppliers. I find that in this case the sales have not been doubted. It is settled law that when sales are not doubted, hundred percent disallowance for bogus purchase cannot be done. The rationale being no sales is possible without actual purchases. This proposition is supported from honourable jurisdictional High Court decision in the case of Nikunj Eximp Enterprises (in writ pe....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ated 11/2/2019 in paragraph 8 there off) ,the addition in respect of bogus purchases is to be limited to the extent of bringing the gross profit rate on such purchases at the same rate as of other genuine purchases. 6. I respectfully following the aforesaid judgement of the honourable High Court set aside the matter to the file of the assessing officer with the direction to restrict the additio....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI