<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1648 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302745</link>
    <description>The ITAT partly allowed the appeal, emphasizing that a hundred percent disallowance for bogus purchases is not justified when sales are not doubted. The ITAT directed the assessing officer to restrict the addition on bogus purchases by aligning the gross profit rate with genuine purchases, following High Court precedents. The assessee was granted an opportunity to present their case adequately in line with the principles laid down by the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2022 20:58:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1648 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302745</link>
      <description>The ITAT partly allowed the appeal, emphasizing that a hundred percent disallowance for bogus purchases is not justified when sales are not doubted. The ITAT directed the assessing officer to restrict the addition on bogus purchases by aligning the gross profit rate with genuine purchases, following High Court precedents. The assessee was granted an opportunity to present their case adequately in line with the principles laid down by the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>