2022 (5) TMI 1296

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... period Feb-Mar20, Apr-Nov 20, Mar 21, June 21 and July 21 passed under Section 74(9) of the GST Act; ii Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the purported clarification with respect to levy of GST on mining activity w.e.f. 01.07.2017 as contained in item H6 of the Press Release issued pursuant to the 45th meeting of the GST Council on 17.09.2021." As per impugned order the petitioner has not paid G.S.T. on the amount of royalty. The petitioner denies his liability of G.S.T. on royalty. In similar WRIT TAX No. - 270 of 2022 (M/S Silverline Automobiles Vs. State Of U P And 3 Others), this Court passed the following order :- "1. Heard Shri Shubham Agrawal, learned counsel for the petiti....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g of minerals ?" 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has invited our attention to the order of Hon'ble Supreme Court dated 11.01.2018 in Special Leave to Appeal (C) 37326 of 2017 (Udaipur Chambers of Commerce and Industry & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors.) which is reproduced below :- "Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the relevant material. Application for exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned order is allowed. Issue notice. Until further orders payment of service tax for grant of mining lease/royalty by the petitioners shall remain stayed." 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has invited our attention to another order dated 18.08.2020 in Wr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....D. Agro Foods Private Limited Vs. Union of India) as has been placed before us, which is reproduced below :- "Heard Shri Vishnu Kesarwani, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Sudarshan Singh, learned counsel for the Union of India and Shri Manu Ghildyal, learned Standing Counsel for the State. While entertaining the writ petition, we had passed the order dated 06.09.2021 which is quoted hereinbelow:- "On the last date, time was granted to the respondents for filing counter affidavit and the same is still awaited. Learned counsel for the respondent prays for and is granted three weeks' further time to file counter affidavit. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within one week, thereafter. Pu....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e above referred interim orders passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court and an interim order passed by a coordinate Bench of this Court , we find that the petitioner has made out a case for interim relief. 10. Let counter affidavit be filed by the respondents within three weeks. Petitioner shall have a week thereafter to file rejoinder affidavit. 11. List after expiry of four weeks before the appropriate Bench alongwith Writ Tax No.475 of 2021 and other similar writ petitions. 12. Until further orders, the impugned demand cum show cause notice dated 14.10.2021 issued by the respondent no.3 with regard to service tax shall remain stayed." 4. Since in similar matters, interim orders have been passed by this Cou....