<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 1296 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423036</link>
    <description>The HC allowed the petitioner&#039;s application for interim relief from GST liability on mining royalty payments to the Government. Following the precedent established in M/S Silverline Automobiles case, where similar interim orders were granted based on SC directions, the court held that the petitioner was equally entitled to interim protection from GST enforcement on royalty payments until final adjudication of the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 10:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=680368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 1296 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423036</link>
      <description>The HC allowed the petitioner&#039;s application for interim relief from GST liability on mining royalty payments to the Government. Following the precedent established in M/S Silverline Automobiles case, where similar interim orders were granted based on SC directions, the court held that the petitioner was equally entitled to interim protection from GST enforcement on royalty payments until final adjudication of the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=423036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>